compare
Bond vs Doozy: AI to-do list comparison (2026)
Bond vs Doozy compared on pricing (trial-only vs free), meeting capture, cross-app execution, approval gates, and BYO API keys. Table and verdict.
Bond pulls tasks from the apps you already use into one prioritized list. Doozy captures the meeting itself, turns it into to-dos, and has agents do the follow-up work with your approval before anything goes out.
Pick Bond if your work is scattered across Gmail, Slack, and Notion and you want one managed list without configuring anything.
Pick Doozy if you want meeting capture, agents that draft follow-ups, approval gates, BYO keys, or a free plan.
Comparison
| Criterion | Bond | Doozy |
|---|---|---|
| Capture sources | connected work apps (Gmail, Slack, Notion, Calendar), third-party meeting notetakers (Fireflies AI, Granola, Fathom, Fellow AI, Circleback, ReadAI)src · 2026-09-04 | meetings, recordings, voice notes, chat messages, documents, files, manual notessrc · 2026-09-04 |
| Execution surface | Gmail + Google Calendar, Outlook, Slack, Linear, Notion, Attio, Hubspot, Jira, ClickUp, Monday.com, Asana, Trello, and moresrc · 2026-09-04 | email, calendar, chat, storage, project management, source control, CRM, and analytics, via workspace-level connectionssrc · 2026-09-04 |
| Approval gates | not documentedsrc · 2026-09-04 | documentedsrc · 2026-09-04 |
| Bring your own keys | not documentedsrc · 2026-09-04 | yessrc · 2026-09-04 |
| Agent access | not documentedsrc · 2026-09-04 | mcp, cli, apisrc · 2026-09-04 |
| Meeting recording | third-partysrc · 2026-09-04 | native (Meeting recording shipped: system audio capture from your device (like Granola), no bot joins the call. $15/month add-on with 15 included hours.)src · 2026-09-09 |
| Free tier | no (Individual plan is labeled 'Free trial — COMING SOON', but the FAQ states the first month costs $199)src · 2026-09-04 | yessrc · 2026-09-04 |
| Pricing | USD 199/month (price stated for the first-month trial in the FAQ; the pricing page lists the individual plan itself as 'Free trial — COMING SOON' with no confirmed ongoing recurring price)src · 2026-09-04 | USD 15/month (Meeting Recording add-on at $15/month (shipped); system audio capture, no bot. The core product is free.)src · 2026-09-04 |
Where Doozy wins
Captures the meeting directly. Doozy records system audio from your device. No bot, no third-party notetaker needed. Bond depends on connecting a notetaker you already pay for (Fireflies, Granola, Fathom, etc.).
Approval before anything goes out. Doozy shows you the exact message, the recipient, and whether you can undo it. Bond doesn't document an approval step.
Free forever with your own keys. Doozy costs nothing for up to five people when you bring your own AI keys. Bond has no documented free plan.
MCP, CLI, and API. Connect Claude Code, Cursor, or your own scripts. Bond documents none of these.
Where Bond has an edge
Meets your stack where it is. Bond connects to Gmail, Slack, Notion, Linear, Jira, HubSpot, ClickUp, Asana, Trello, and more out of the box. If your problem is scattered commitments rather than unfinished follow-ups, that's the shorter path.
Uses your existing notetaker. Bond connects to Fireflies, Granola, Fathom, and others instead of asking you to change how you record meetings.
Nothing to supply. No API keys, no model choices. Bond is opinionated and managed.
Built-in routines. Repetitive chases are part of the product, not something you assemble.
Where they agree
Both pull work from connected apps into one to-do surface. Both act inside those apps rather than handing you a checklist. Both are early stage: Bond's pricing isn't fully settled, and Doozy's meeting recording add-on just shipped. Both publish their integrations and data handling openly enough to check.
A Monday in each tool
- The call ends. Bond sees it once your notetaker posts. Doozy captured the audio directly.
- Tasks get created. Bond builds a prioritized list from your connected apps. Doozy creates to-dos with owners from the meeting.
- Follow-ups happen. Bond runs automated routines. Doozy agents draft across your apps and wait for approval.
- Something needs to go external. Doozy holds the email for your review. Bond has no documented approval step.
- Your coding tool wants in. Doozy has MCP, CLI, and API. Bond has none.
Moving from Bond to Doozy
| In Bond | In Doozy | What changes |
|---|---|---|
| Connected tools | Connections | Re-authorize each app once in Doozy. |
| Prioritized list | To-dos | Same idea, plus owners, status, history, and linked captures. |
| Third-party notetaker | Captures | Doozy records meetings directly. Keep your notetaker as a backup. |
| Automated routines | Scheduled to-dos | Recurring work becomes a scheduled to-do with an agent. |
| No approval step | Approvals | New concept. External actions pause for your review. |
| No BYO keys | Your own keys | You add keys once. This is what makes the free plan free. |
Bottom line
Bond is the shorter path if your problem is scattered commitments across many apps and you want one managed list. Doozy is the choice if you want the meeting captured, agents doing the follow-through, approval before anything ships, and a free start on your own keys.
Frequently asked questions
Does Bond have a free plan?
Not a permanent one. The individual plan is a trial marked "coming soon." Doozy is free forever for up to five people.
Does Bond record meetings?
Not natively. It connects to third-party notetakers like Fireflies and Granola.
Does Bond ask for approval before acting?
Not documented. Doozy has approval gates for external messages, purchases, deletions, and more.
Does Bond support BYO keys?
Not documented. Doozy runs on your own OpenRouter, Deepgram, and Composio keys.
Can I connect Claude Code to Bond?
Bond has no documented MCP, CLI, or API. Doozy has all three.
Sources
- Bond (checked 2026-09-04)
- Bond pricing (checked 2026-09-04)
- Doozy features (checked 2026-09-04)
- Doozy pricing (checked 2026-09-04)
- Doozy approvals (checked 2026-09-04)